Maybe it's me, but I found this post kind of inappropriate since it came without caveats. One might think/hope that whoever defined a space as non-cancelale or non-memtermable had a legitimate reason for doing so. That likely isn't of course always true, but isn't that what you really need to assume?
Unless you are willing to risk your system and its data by assuming that it is OK to cancel something that is non-cancelable or memterm something that is non-memtermable then the action taken by this tool is inappropriate. And by including "and its data" I mean to include that you could conceivably break some data that you won't be able to fix by re-IPL. Not likely, but conceivable. Peter Relson z/OS Core Technology Design ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
