[Default] On 14 Jun 2017 14:57:21 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
frank.swarbr...@outlook.com (Frank Swarbrick) wrote:

>I won't try to justify EBCDIC, but big-endian rules!  :-)
>
Unfortunately, little-endian which comes from the same warped thinking
that went into the COND JCL statement seems to be ubiquitous.
Little-endian is illogical and a royal pain in so many ways.  The
developers of it should be ashamed of themselves.

Clark Morris

>________________________________
>From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> on behalf of 
>Paul Gilmartin <0000000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>
>Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2017 3:44 PM
>To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
>Subject: Re: RFE? xlc compile option for C integers to be "Intel compat" or 
>Little-Endian
>
>On Wed, 14 Jun 2017 20:29:22 +0000, Frank Swarbrick wrote:
>
>>There are big-endian machines other than z.  Shouldn't you investigate how 
>>the issue is dealt with outside of z before asking for z exclusive language 
>>extensions?
>>
>Yes.  But big-endian is a vanishing breed.  Motorola 68K is gone; PowerPC is
>mostly gone, and its endianness was selectable.  There's little interest in
>Sparc.  Others?
>
>Dismayinglly, big-endian may come to be perceived as the same sort
>of lunatic fringe as EBCDIC, and support will evaporate with the scarcity
>of testing platforms.  But the EBCDIC nightmare can be avoided:  Linux
>runs fine on z hardware.
>
>-- gil
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
>send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
>send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to