Perhaps you forgot EUT=YES in an EUT environment? On Fri, 28 Jul 2017 18:37:11 +0000 Leonardo Vaz <leonardo....@cn.ca> wrote:
:>Old thread, but I am curious based on a recent issue I had; it seems the ESTAE got control before the FRR, documentation seems to state that FRR gets control before the estae, is that right? So if my FRR never got control it must be that there was no space for an SDWA, or "the latest ESTAE always get control first", before even the FRRs? :> :>Thanks, :>Leo :> :>-----Original Message----- :>From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Binyamin Dissen :>Sent: Sunday, February 12, 2017 3:22 AM :>To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU :>Subject: Re: FRR Clarification :> :>On Sat, 11 Feb 2017 19:15:51 -0500 Joe Reichman <reichman...@gmail.com> wrote: :> :>:>When trying to cover my code I always choose an FRR If I am in Supervisor :>State :> :>:>* Always get an SDWA :> :>If no storage available for the SDWA, the FRR does not get control. An ESTAE will. :> :>:>* Would get control before an ESTAE :> :>The latest ESTAE always get control first. :> :>:>So If I'm In SRB mode I have no choice in task mode I can code EUT=YES. :>:>However now looking over the Doc "Once a program activates an EUT FRR it :>cannot issue an SVC's" :> :>:>So while SETFRR is providing coverage the program cant issue any SVC's? :> :>Correct. :> :>FRR is faster, but it has constraints. -- Binyamin Dissen <bdis...@dissensoftware.com> http://www.dissensoftware.com Director, Dissen Software, Bar & Grill - Israel Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a response from me, you should preauthorize the dissensoftware.com domain. I very rarely bother responding to challenge/response systems, especially those from irresponsible companies. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
