How about an II APAR with notes about errors in the manuals? On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 12:29 PM, Tom Ross <tmr...@stlvm20.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: >>Very, considering there are literally hundreds if not thousands of shops >>still using COBOL.. > > Yes, it is unfortunate, but for a serious error we would reconsider our > position > on COBOL V4 documentation. > > In this case, the reported bug was very minor, and most of the many many COBOL > shops are already using COBOL V5 or V6, whose manuals are getting updated. > > The number of defects reported against COBOL V4 is almost zero! That is one > of > the reasons why we are considering dropping support for COBOL V4. > > Cheers, > TomR >> COBOL is the Language of the Future! << > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
-- Mike A Schwab, Springfield IL USA Where do Forest Rangers go to get away from it all? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
