On Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 9:18 PM, Tony Thigpen <t...@vse2pdf.com> wrote:

> We have a staff z/OS systems programmer who claims that:
> "Almost all shops use the SYS3. HLQ to indicate third party software."
>
> So new software installs *have* to follow that "rule". (Past installs did
> not follow such a rule.)
>
> I am thinking that this "rule" is really just *his* rule.
>

​I agree with you. That is *HIS* rule. Now, having said that, we do happen
to use SYS3 as the HLQ for all 3rd party software run-time libraries. I.e.
they are the ones which we customize. The "distribution" libraries start
with SYS5. And we even have SYS4 libraries which are "system" libraries
which the _programmers_ can update. So they're not really system
libraries.​ But at other shops, I have used other HLQs for OEM products.
E.g. COMPWARE. and CA.



>
> Opinions?
>
> How many other sites follow such a rule?
>
> --
> Tony Thigpen
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>



-- 
I got this powdered water -- now I don't know what to add.
                -- Steven Wright


Maranatha! <><
John McKown

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to