On Thu, 24 May 2018 09:14:20 -0500, John McKown wrote: >OK, y'all probably know that I'm on a very back level system -- z/OS 1.12 >and we're even back level on maintenance. I'm trying to get more up to >date, mainly for "fun & profit". Anyway. There are a number of RACF modules >which were hit and SMP/E tries to relink them. The problem seems to be that >some CSECTs are missing in the relink.
Was this something that happened during the APPLY of a PTF? Did the PTF include JCLIN? What MCS statements are in the PTF? AFAIK, normal behavior of SMP/E when applying a PTF that contains a replacement ++MOD is that all LMODs that contain that module are relinked. The original load module (or program object) is included, and the module from the PTF is included. In this way, all of the CSECTs in the load module are retained, and the one supplied by the PTF replaces the original. >They are in the LMOD in the running >LINKLIB. In the output, I see the binder output which tries to relink the >module. I see the missing CSECTs. The CSECTs which are not missing are have >Binder " INCLUDE AOSBN(csect)" in the binder's input stream. The CSECTs >which are needed are in AOSBN properly, but there is no INCLUDE for them. > >I've never had anything like this happen before. I've been looking around >in the current SMP/E manual and I _might_ be able to "fix" all the LMOD >entries using UCLIN. But this seems to be dangerous to me. I wouldn't do that. >Any suggestions other than a stiff shot of something "nice" and "soothing"? PMR. -- Tom Marchant ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
