On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 12:40 PM Seymour J Metz <sme...@gmu.edu> wrote:
> Did you do anything equivalent to NCAL? > No, but why would IBM do INCLUDE statements for some MODS but not others in the same distribution library (AOSBN)? > > Have you looked at the MOD entries for the missing csects? > Yes, they look correct to me. The entries for each MOD (missing & not missing) points to AOSBN as where it resides. > > Have you looked at the LMOD entry? > CALL? > CALLLIBS? > NOCALL? > Yeap. I did all that. There is a CALLLIBS for SCEELKED and a SYSLIB for LINKLIB. What seems missing to me are the LKED "INCLUDE AOSBN(csect)" statements. There are some a number of those for other CSECTs. But none for the missing CSECTs. To my way of thinking, if you INCLUDE some MODS from AOSBN, then it is reasonable to INCLUDE other, used, MODS which are refereced and exist in AOSBN. And the "missing" CSECTs are indeed in the target zone with AOSBN as the library in which they reside. > > > -- > Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz > http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 > -- Once a government places vague notions of public safety and security above the preservation of freedom, a general loss of liberty is sure to follow. GCS Griffin -- Pelaran Alliance -- TFS Guardian (book) Maranatha! <>< John McKown ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
