On Thu, 7 Jun 2018 10:42:14 -0400, Gord Tomlin wrote: >On 2018-06-07 09:01, John McKown wrote: >> I do like what CA >> does in some of their products which would be nice to have in these >> facilities. They display the date as either dd/mm/yyyy.ddd or >> mm/dd/yyyy.ddd . I think that having a new value for HCFORMAT(...) in the >> CONSOLnn member would be nice. > >If you're going to agitate for something like this, how about going for >the unambiguous ISO 8601 format yyyy-mm-dd, either instead of or in >addition to the ambiguous dd/mm/... or mm/dd/... > +1 https://xkcd.com/1179/
-- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
