On Sat, 14 Jul 2018 09:30:37 +0000, Robert Prins wrote: >On 2018-07-13 01:29, CM Poncelet wrote: > > What 'problem' with JCL is fixed by replacing it with REXX? > >REXX doesn't have a limit of 255 steps in a job, and that limit may be reached >when doing regression tests. It also allows loops. Example I have is too long >to >post here (probably). > Rexx is available. If Rexx meets your needs, then simply use Rexx.
But why clamor, apparently for the demise of JCL? -- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
