An unauthorized program can do EXCP with an appendage., as long as it's specified in PARMLIB.
-- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 ________________________________________ From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu> on behalf of Charles Mills <charl...@mcn.org> Sent: Monday, July 16, 2018 12:35 PM To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu Subject: Re: Linklist and APF > the main CPCS task had to run APF Didn't MICR-check-reading programs need authorized channel appendage routines to do pocket selection? Charles -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Jesse 1 Robinson Sent: Monday, July 16, 2018 9:08 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Linklist and APF The shop I worked in was a bank that ran IBM's CPCS check processing software. I don't know why, but the main CPCS task had to run APF and required that all called programs also come from APF libraries. Even the most ho-hum benign programs. Add to that requirement a corporate security policy against running production jobs from STEPLIB/JOBLIB on the grounds that link list libraries could be 'monitored', but who knew what might live in private libraries. The resulting effect on LNKLSTxx was significant. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN