An unauthorized program can do EXCP with an appendage., as long as it's 
specified in PARMLIB.


--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3

________________________________________
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu> on behalf of 
Charles Mills <charl...@mcn.org>
Sent: Monday, July 16, 2018 12:35 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Linklist and APF

> the main CPCS task had to run APF

Didn't MICR-check-reading programs need authorized channel appendage routines 
to do pocket selection?

Charles


-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf 
Of Jesse 1 Robinson
Sent: Monday, July 16, 2018 9:08 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Linklist and APF

The shop I worked in was a bank that ran IBM's CPCS check processing software. 
I don't know why, but the main CPCS task had to run APF and required that all 
called programs also come from APF libraries. Even the most ho-hum benign 
programs.

Add to that requirement a corporate security policy against running production 
jobs from STEPLIB/JOBLIB on the grounds that link list libraries could be 
'monitored', but who knew what might live in private libraries. The resulting 
effect on LNKLSTxx was significant.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to