I would like to reiterate David Crawford's question: why use Metal C instead of the complete C?
Metal C is intended for writing exits and small routines where full functionality isn't needed. It is a crippled C environment, and while you may enjoy pushing it to its limits and beyond, you should at least be able to articulate your reason for doing so. For full disclosure, I have plenty of experience with Metal C being used... just because somebody wanted to. Something tells me that if IBM had called it C-lite, or Basic C, it would have stayed in its place. sas On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 5:29 PM, Thomas David Rivers <riv...@dignus.com> wrote: > ... > > I'm sure something similar in metal-C would work... > > - Dave Rivers - > > > -- > riv...@dignus.com Work: (919) 676-0847 > Get your mainframe programming tools at http://www.dignus.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
