Because otherwise you risk an S106. A better question is why you didn't consult 
with the MVS group and devise a bulletproof maintenance strategy.


--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3

________________________________________
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu> on behalf of 
Barkow, Eileen <ebar...@doitt.nyc.gov>
Sent: Monday, October 1, 2018 10:21 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu
Subject: Re: S106 abends after copying into LINKLIST

The  whole idea was not to have to refresh LLA - we wanted to wait until the 
IPL.
Why should LLA have to be refreshed if we did not want the changes to take 
effect?

-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf 
Of ITschak Mugzach
Sent: Monday, October 01, 2018 10:19 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: S106 abends after copying into LINKLIST

You need to refresh lla.

בתאריך יום ב׳, 1 באוק׳ 2018, 16:10, מאת Barkow, Eileen ‏<
ebar...@doitt.nyc.gov>:

> Hi MVS gurus.
>  Perhaps someone can offer a plausible explanation for this, so that
> the MVS group will stop blaming the CICS group for the problem.
>
> Last friday morning we copied new CICS LINKLIST/LPA modules into the
> existing LINKLIST/LPA loadlibs
> in use (a rather new scenario in use here - we used to use alternative
> datasets), in anticipation of an IPL to
> be done sunday morning.
> anyway, around 6pm friday evening, an I/O error occured in linklist and
> other jobs started abending with S106 abends.
> the linklist library was not allocated with secondary extents and there
> was no LLA refresh issued during
> the day. I cannot find anything like this situation occurring on IBMLINK
> and we have no dump of the original failure.
>
> Does anyone have any idea of what could have caused the I/O error.
> both the input and output datasets have a max blksize of 32760.
>
> IEW4009I FETCH FAILED FOR MODULE DFHXCPRX FROM DDNAME -LNKLST- BECAUSE
> OF AN I/O ERROR.
> IEW4005I FETCH FOR MODULE DFHXCPRX FROM DDNAME -LNKLST- FAILED BECAUSE
> IEWFETCH ISSUED RC 0F AND REASON 40
> CSV031I LIBRARY ACCESS FAILED FOR MODULE DFHXCPRX, RETURN CODE 24,
> REASON CODE 26080021, DDNAME *LNKLST*
>
>
>
>
>
>   ________________________________
>
> This e-mail, including any attachments, may be confidential, privileged or
> otherwise legally protected. It is intended only for the addressee. If you
> received this e-mail in error or from someone who was not authorized to
> send it to you, do not disseminate, copy or otherwise use this e-mail or
> its attachments. Please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail and
> delete the e-mail from your system.
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to