Isn't 3590 a generic?
-- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 ________________________________________ From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu> on behalf of Tony Thigpen <t...@vse2pdf.com> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2018 7:59 AM To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu Subject: OS/390 (not z/OS) question In an OS/390 2.10 system. where is the esoteric 3590-1 defined? Can it be overridden? We are trying to migrate an old OS/390 system and the first stage is to migrate the tape usage to a VTL. The VTL looks like 3590-128trk while the old 3590s are 3590-256trak. The problem is that when an input request for old tapes appear, the system is asking for the real 3590-256track tape to be mounted on the VTL drives (defined as 3590-128track). RMM is the tape manager. We think the system defined 3590-1 esoteric is the problem, but it does not settable in the HCD on that version of OS/390. -- Tony Thigpen ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
