It's especially sad that the SHARE JES2 Singalong has withered into oblivion. This would have made a sterling entry.
. . J.O.Skip Robinson Southern California Edison Company Electric Dragon Team Paddler SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager 323-715-0595 Mobile 626-543-6132 Office ⇐=== NEW robin...@sce.com -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Chris Hoelscher Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2018 10:51 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: (External):[OT] z/OS (not OS/390) (with apologies to They Might be Giants- Istanbul, not Constantinople) z/os was os/390 Now it's z/os , not os/390 Been a long time gone, Oh os/390 Now it's Poughkeepsie delight on a moonlit night Every sysprog in os/390 Codes for z/os , not os/390 if you've got a billing rate for os/390 It'll be higher in z/os Even old Islandia was once New East Icelip Why he changed it I can't say Charles just liked it better that way So, Take me back to os/390 No, you can't go back to os/390 Been a long time gone, Oh os/390 Why did os/390 get the New?? That's nobody's business but Big Blue z/os z/os z/os z/os Even old Islandia was once New East Icelip Why he changed it I can't say Charles just liked it better that way So, Take me back to os/390 No, you can't go back to os/390 Been a long time gone, Oh os/390 Why did os/390 get the New?? That's nobody's business but Big Blue z/os z/os z/os Chris Hoelscher Technology Architect, Database Infrastructure Services Technology Solution Services Humana Inc. 123 East Main Street Louisville, KY 40202 Humana.com (502) 476-2538 or 407-7266 -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> On Behalf Of Carmen Vitullo Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2018 9:34 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: [IBM-MAIN] OS/390 (not z/OS) question Thinking back and firing up those old brain cells I recall my lead MVS guy use to export the IODF, alter it as he needed to (adding new esoterics?) and import it back to HCD and build the IODF and IOCDS. I've never done this and I'm not sure your level of HCD will support it but it's worth a try. Carmen Vitullo ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tony Thigpen" <t...@vse2pdf.com> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2018 8:02:15 AM Subject: Re: OS/390 (not z/OS) question When I use HCD to 'Work with EDTs', it shows locally defined esoterics, but not the one for 3590-1. When I use HCD to 'View generics by name', I see 3590-1, but I can't change it. Can I just add a 3590-1 in 'Work with EDTs' and then that override the one the system generates? Tony Thigpen Giovanni Bozzetti wrote on 11/21/18 8:46 AM: > Hi > > Look redbook SG24-5597 Apr 2000 > ABC OS/390 Vol 1 has EDT and HCD/IOCP > > Giovanni > > -----Original Message----- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] > On Behalf Of Tony Thigpen > Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2018 12:59 PM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: OS/390 (not z/OS) question > > In an OS/390 2.10 system. where is the esoteric 3590-1 defined? Can it > be overridden? > > We are trying to migrate an old OS/390 system and the first stage is > to migrate the tape usage to a VTL. The VTL looks like 3590-128trk > while the old 3590s are 3590-256trak. > > The problem is that when an input request for old tapes appear, the > system is asking for the real 3590-256track tape to be mounted on the > VTL drives (defined as 3590-128track). RMM is the tape manager. We > think the system defined 3590-1 esoteric is the problem, but it does > not settable in the HCD on that version of OS/390. > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
