I found this to be the most irritating aspect of working with 64 bit areas.
On Fri, Jan 25, 2019, 5:23 PM Charles Mills <charl...@mcn.org wrote: > I have an application that uses IARV64 REQUEST=GETCOMMON,COND=YES. I have > tested with an unreasonable request size and gotten a return with a reason > code as expected. > > I recently had the IARV64 fail, due to my bug that I have located. But what > surprised me is that I got an SDC2 ABEND rather than a return with a reason > code. I would rather get a return because I can handle it more neatly than > an ABEND (although yes, I do catch the ABEND with ESTAE). Why the ABEND > rather than a return? Can I force a return rather than an ABEND? Is this > documented somewhere? (I obviously did not see it.) > > In case it matters the reason code in question is xx0042yy, Guard size is > greater than object size. (And again, I have located the underlying bug; I > don't need help with that; just with "why ABEND rather than return?") > > z/OS V2R2 and V2R3, if that matters. > > Charles > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
