>From the you can’t make this up department. Mr. Marchant agrees with me.
https://www.compuware.com/proving-z13-modern/ Talk of “modernization” of mainframe systems is often code for redesigning mainframe-based applications and implementing them to run on Windows, or less frequently, on Unix or Linux. None of these systems can match the security capabilities of modern mainframe operating systems. Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone On Tuesday, June 4, 2019, 10:45 AM, Tom Marchant <0000000a2a8c2020-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: On Tue, 4 Jun 2019 00:01:01 +0000, Bill Johnson wrote: >noise and plenty of it. PKB. You have posted more to this thread than anyone else. You have claimed that security is the main reason people stay on the mainframe, and posted a few articles that do not say what you claimed they say. You have insisted several times that your MVS systems have never been hacked without providing any evidence or serious reasoning as to how you could know that. "40 years of experience" is not evidence. It's called appeal to authority, and it is a logical fallacy. When your assertions are questioned, your response is to attack those who question you rather than provide evidence. Another logical fallacy. -- Tom Marchant ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
