I suspect John's answer will be 1) because it's cool to try new things 2) because I want to limit the destruction if it goes wrong.
Waiting for the real answer, Rob On Sun, Jun 9, 2019, 6:22 PM Binyamin Dissen <bdis...@dissensoftware.com> wrote: > On Fri, 7 Jun 2019 08:57:38 -0500 John McKown < > john.archie.mck...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > :>I am not finding this. I want to change the PKM for my running, APF > :>authorized, program to include key 0. Why? So that I can switch in and > out > :>of key 0 using an SPKA instruction rather than MODESET. But mainly so > that > :>I can use the MVCSK and MVCDK instructions to read & update key 0, fetch > :>protected, storage without going into key 0. > > :>Or am I just being silly (again)? > > Why not simply run supervisor state which allows access to all keys? > > -- > Binyamin Dissen <bdis...@dissensoftware.com> > http://www.dissensoftware.com > > Director, Dissen Software, Bar & Grill - Israel > > > Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a response from me, > you should preauthorize the dissensoftware.com domain. > > I very rarely bother responding to challenge/response systems, > especially those from irresponsible companies. > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
