I can say I've done this also, <CUT><PASTE> removed the include additional qualifiers, not good timing, right after I created a new master catalog for my 2.1 or 2.2 systems YIKES!
Carmen Vitullo ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dana Mitchell" <mitchd...@gmail.com> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2019 1:02:40 PM Subject: Re: Alias Listcat discrepancy betweeen sysplex'd LPARs On Tue, 11 Jun 2019 17:28:44 +0000, Jesse 1 Robinson <jesse1.robin...@sce.com> wrote: >We had a 'catalog anomaly' recently were one person got a different list of >data sets under 3.4 than I did, both of us using the same search criterion. >Turns out we had different selections set In the options list: > I experienced this just last week. The user inadvertently un-slahsed the 'Include Additional Qualifiers ' option. Produced very different results than expected. Dana ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
