Charles Mills wrote: >Thanks @Scott and @Elardus.
You're most welcome! >I have submitted an RCF and copied @Scott. Cool! Keep them busy. ;-) >@Elardus -- don't forget IEFU86. Yes, you're right. I just copied (in a hurry!) the list of the IEFU8x involved from a bookie in KC. >> due to security and integrity of the SMF records themselves, IBM is not >> talking much about it. >Security by obscurity? Perhaps, There is even a way to create and validate SMF records with digital signatures. But, still, you can modify it as per earlier discussion, then at the last stage, those records are then signed. "Security by obscurity" - is only working in theory ... ;-) Look at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Security_through_obscurity for some discussion... Groete / Greetings Elardus Engelbrecht ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
