Sometimes 0M or 0G will cause problems with RTM. You might want to try a real larger number like 512M or 1000M
If there is no below the line storage available for recovery then 0M can cause some really strange occurrences. What does your virtual storage look like when your job ends? Lizette > -----Original Message----- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> On Behalf Of > Charles Mills > Sent: Sunday, August 25, 2019 6:58 AM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: S0C4 XL C Compiler > > REGION=0G will give you a thousand times more. > > Seriously, I had one of these the other day. I ran a C++ compile -- not with > my usual JCL -- and got a S0C4. Like you, I went "I can't believe this!" I > tried something simple and the problem went away -- don't recall what it was > that I did, so thought perhaps it was that I had increased the region. The > problem was so out of left field and so quickly fixed that I do not recall > the circumstances. Was within the last month, so perhaps some recent > maintenance broke the compiler. > > Charles > > > -----Original Message----- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On > Behalf Of Joseph Reichman > Sent: Saturday, August 24, 2019 6:40 PM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: S0C4 XL C Compiler > > REGION=0M I Think that's the max > > -----Original Message----- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> On Behalf Of > Charles Mills > Sent: Saturday, August 24, 2019 9:36 PM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: S0C4 XL C Compiler > > Try increasing the region. > > Charles > > > -----Original Message----- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On > Behalf Of Joseph Reichman > Sent: Saturday, August 24, 2019 6:27 PM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: S0C4 XL C Compiler > > > > Simple little program cannt believe it > > > > #include <ctest.h> > > #include <ceeedcct.h> > > #include <string.h> > > #include <stdio.h> > > #include <stdlib.h> > > #include <dll.h> > > #pragma map(__ceetest,"CEETEST") > > #pragma linkage(CEETEST,OS_NOSTACK) > > main( int argc, char* argv[]) > > { > > typedef int (DLL_FN)(char *) > > dllhandle* dllHandle; > > DLL_FN* fn; > > _VSTRING commands; > > _FEEDBACK fc; > > > CEETEST(&commands,&fc); > > dllHandle = dllload("SYSADATA"); > > fn = (DLL_FN*) (dllqueryfn(dllHandle, "opendata")); > > fn("SYSADATA"); > > return; > > } > > > > CEE3204S The system detected a protection exception (System Completion > Code=0C4). > > From entry point dtFuncDeclarator::BeginNestedFunc(sFuncSymbol*) > at statement 729 at compile unit offset > > +00000510 at entry offset +00000510 at address 21DEB1B8. > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to > lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
