On Thu, 29 Aug 2019 06:34:34 -0500, Steve Horein wrote: > >Much better. >While I can't help with the question of "what really happens...", it does >seem that -something- must happen to the PDSE to allow successful deletion >of those members. In the case of this particular NetView data set, "REACC" >appears to be that thing. Perhaps in the case of LLA managed data sets, it >would be the "F LLA,UPDATE=..."? > After a program has issued BLDL or DESERV, PDSE is obliged to assume that any members returned are in use until the program issues STOW DISC. I surmise that REACC (sounds like CMS jargon) issues the DISC.
Does NetView gain any performance benefit by hoarding TTRs rather than issuing DISC sooner? -- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
