On Wed, 25 Sep 2019 20:13:41 +0000, Gibney, Dave wrote: >I will give them a try :) > >But, I will again take this opportunity to plea for the return of Bookmanager >format :) > It's a hard business case to make to IBM when some documents have outgrown the capabilities of Bookie and some COTS PDF authoring tools may cost less than upgrading Bookie, and PDF readers are available to end users for a plethora of platforms at very attractive prices.
But the PDF library could be better organized, perhaps into multiple directories with a README in each. And the index.html better designed -- I've already suggested putting the clickable link closer to the document title. And some documents which were split for perhaps no better reason than ring binder capacity could be coalesced so the ToCs could be merged. >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Susan Shumway >> Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2019 12:34 PM >> >> ... That's the PDF collection with the snazzy Adobe Indexed search >> capability that users liken to BookManager. -- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
