Jim, I suspect it would get fixed if it ever broke; lucky for us it does not break. Here is the listfile stats for the FCOPY package that I am using:
$FCOPY$ $PROFILE V2 V 79 43 1 2003-05-06 15:49:38 $FCOPY$ HELPCMS V2 V 79 149 2 1998-02-05 14:07:30 $FCOPY$ XEDIT V2 V 116 911 7 2000-05-18 11:12:25 FCOPY ANNOUNCE V1 V 65 5 1 2002-05-02 15:37:51 FCOPY HELPCMS V2 V 79 565 9 2002-05-02 15:37:51 FCOPY INFO V1 V 72 80 1 1998-02-05 14:08:14 FCOPY MODULE V2 F 520 1 1 1998-04-13 08:34:53 FCOPY XMOD V2 V 19552 4 13 1998-08-21 15:35:24 FCOPYE MODULE V2 V 13232 3 4 1999-05-18 09:52:27 FCOPYEPI XEDIT V2 V 64 7 1 1998-02-05 14:12:41 FCOPYPRO HELPXEDI V2 V 79 34 1 1998-02-05 14:12:51 FCOPYPRO XEDIT V2 V 72 173 2 1998-02-05 14:08:04 FCOPYTRS MODULE V2 V 65535 3 17 1989-12-10 15:29:09 FCOPYXA MODULE V1 V 11104 3 3 1998-03-31 16:22:05 GARBLE WARNING V1 V 72 22 1 2002-05-02 15:37:51 You might want to compare what you are running with the level I am running. I only used the files listed above. I do not have access to any other level of FCOPY. Doug Breneman z/VM Development IBM Endicott, NY Friday, April 21, 2006 11:56 AM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU cc: From: Jim Bohnsack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: FCOPY Great!! My guess is that FCOPY is probably still so widely used inside IBM that it would be fixed if a new CMS broke something. Right? Jim At 11:48 AM 4/21/2006, you wrote: >Jim, >I have access to z/VM 5.2.0 and FCOPY. I have done the following: >- create a new packlib from a set of files. >- list the contents of the new packlib. >- unpack the contents of the new packlib. >- list a set of files from a packlib created in 2002. >- unpack a set of files from a packlib created in 2002. > >All of these tests were successful. >Doug Breneman z/VM development IBM Endicott, NY > >Friday, April 21, 2006 11:18 AM >To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU >cc: >From: Jim Bohnsack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: FCOPY > > >A thought that I just had was that if someone who is currently running or >has access to z/VM 5.1 or 5.2 uses or can try FCOPY, maybe that would be >good enough. We are on 4.4 right now but should be on 5.2 or whatever is >current next winter when we get a z/box. Supposedly the mainframe will be >out of here in 3 years or so, so if FCOPY runs on V5, that should be >OK. I'll be outta here in 2 1/2 years :-) >Jim > >Jim Bohnsack >Cornell Univ. >(607) 255-1760 Jim Bohnsack Cornell Univ. (607) 255-1760
