Ack! I really can spell, but my typing is terrible
when I typing into a web page. Apologies to all.
Thanks Eric, I will try this in the morning. I've
pretty well been up all weekend and my eyes just won't stay open.
Again, apologies to the list for that horrific
typing.
-Paul
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, May 08, 2006 6:03 PM
Subject: Re: FCP Attached Tape Drives
(z/VM, z/Linux) - Help Please!
Hi Paul,
When issuing a "SET EDEV xxxx TYPE FBA ATTR yyyy
[paths]" command, the "xxxx" value should be an unused RDEV number that will
be created. The FCP RDEV number (D200) is used later in the command,
following the "FCP_DEV" operand.
Hope this helps you avoid your maintenance window.
Regards,
Eric
Eric Farman z/VM I/O Development IBM Endicott,
NY (607)429-4958 (tie 620)
Paul Raulerson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System
<IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU>
05/08/2006 06:17 PM
Please respond
to The IBM z/VM Operating System
<IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU> |
|
To
| IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
|
cc
|
|
Subject
| Re: FCP Attached Tape Drives
(z/VM, z/Linux) - Help Please! |
|
Steve Wilkin's page is a goldmine! Thanks for the pointer. :)
I
see I gotten myself in a conumdrum here - the FCP port if available, but I
should not have defined any devices on it. "SET EDEVICE xxxx xxx xx xx xx
... " results in a complaint that 'D200 is a defined as a real device".
I suppose it is time for yet another maintenance window, and bring
her down again. (*sigh*)
I should not be this difficult. :) :) :) :)
I suppose I am going to have to start a VM User group down here -
the closest one I know of the CaveMen guys up in Chigaco. :)
-Paul -----
Message from "Alan Altmark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Mon, 8 May 2006
20:27:00 +0000 -----
To:
| IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
|
Subject:
| Re: FCP Attached Tape Drives (z/VM, z/Linux) - Help
Please! | On Monday, 05/08/2006
at 04:20 GMT, Paul Raulerson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I modified the IODC (using the HMC, I have not figured
out how to use the z/VM > software for doing so yet... :) to
change a free FC channel to a FCP channel, > and added a CUNUMBR
line to support. I?ve included the definition file below, > with
the interesting bits marked in red.:) > > From z/VM I can do a
query on the CHPID (F3 in this case) and I see that it > thinks
there are devices available out there. That is kind strange, because the
> new tapes are not yet attached there are two new 3592 TS1120
tape drives ready > to connect to the SAN switch and configure. The
FiCON port is also ready to > connect to the SAN switch and, if
necessary, do any configuration.
Actually, VM doesn't see the SCSI
devices. What it sees are the subchannels on the chpid. In
normal ESCON attachment, the control units actively participate in the I/O
process. They know which devices are available and which devices are
not.
For SCSI, there is no traditional control unit to manage device
attachment to the I/O subsystem. There's just a cable the plugs into
your FC switch. The connection to a particular drive is established
dynamically via a specific protocol between the guest or CP and the
switch.
So as long as the chpid is active, all of the devices you
defined on the chpid will appear, but they don't have active devices on
them until CP (via EDEVICE) or a guest (via its own SCSI device drivers)
does something.
> Problem is, from this point on I am lost
there are WorldWidePort addresses and > a lot of other
terminology I am not familiar with. So any references or > pointers
would be very much appreciated. I have a feeling that this is not all
> that hard. The Shark is current attached to the same SAN switches,
and provides > DASD for the PC?s.
See Steve Wilkins' home
page: http://www.vm.ibm.com/devpages/wilkinss where you will find several
of his presentations on z/VM and SCSI. These are excellent
resources. (Steve is the Father of z/VM SCSI.) It helps if you
can sit down with someone who has storage expertise to help round out some
of the practical considerations.
And get thee to a VM user group near
thee! If the user group requests someone come and speak on SCSI, we
are more than happy to oblige.
Alan Altmark z/VM Development IBM
Endicott
|