Aren't tape labels written at the "least common denominator" that a drive is capable of writing? If the density of a written tape is only checked by looking at the labels, that would explain what you are seeing.

Jim

At 03:45 PM 6/9/2006, you wrote:
Wow, it really is Friday if JR appears to have problems with a TAPE
command!  ;-)

From z/VM 5.1 HELP (and the manual), George seems to have it right.

>>--TAPE--.-| DUMP
|-------------.------------------------------------------><
          |-| LOAD |-------------|
          |-| SCAN or SKIP |-----|
          |-| DVOL1 |------------|
          |-| WVOL1 |------------|
          |-| MODESET or QUERY |-|
          '-| tapecmd |----------'

blah, blah, blah

MODESET or QUERY:
|--MODESET or
QUERY--.---------------------.---------------------------------|
                     '-(--| Opt D |--.---.-'
                                     '-)-'

blah, blah, blah

Opt D:
         (1)
   .-181----.               (2)
|--+--------+--.----------.--------------------------------------------------|

   |-TAPn---|  |-9TRACK---|
   '-vdev---'  |-18TRACK--|
               |-3490B----|
               |-3490C----|
               |-3590B----|
               |-3590C----|
               |-DEN 38K--|
               |-DEN 800--|
               |-DEN 1600-|
               |-DEN 6250-|
               |-COMP-----|
               |-NOCOMP---|
               '-XF-------'

UofKs TAPEMAP command is great, but badly out of date.  Rich's TAPINFO
modules may fall into the same bucket?
Do you have a z/OS system around running FATS or FATAR?  Those, being
current and supported products, are likely to produce reliable results.

Once you find out, you can develop and distribute updates to TAPEMAP and
TAPINFO, right?  ;-)

What does TAPE QUERY show before and after "TAPE MODESET (XF"?

Mike Walter
Hewitt Associates
The opinions expressed herein are mine alone, not my employer's.




"Imler, Steven J" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Sent by: "The IBM z/VM Operating System" <IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU>
06/09/2006 02:32 PM
Please respond to
"The IBM z/VM Operating System" <IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU>



To
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
cc

Subject
Re: Tape Modeset for 3480 XF






George,

Use HELP CMS TAPE ...

It's TAPE MODESET ( DEN 38K

JR (Steven) Imler
CA
Senior Software Engineer
Tel:  +1 703 708 3479
Fax:  +1 703 708 3267
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-----Original Message-----
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of George Haddad
Sent: Friday, June 09, 2006 03:12 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Tape Modeset for 3480 XF

Maybe I'm missing something obvious, but I'm trying to write to a 3480
cart  using TAPE MODESET (XF. The TAPE QUERY command confirms that the
drive is capable of writing mode XF. But whatever I do, the data is
apparently being written as 38k bpi, according to both the UofK TAPEMAP
and Rich Greenberg's TAPINFO Modules.

I've tried issuing TAPE MODESET (XF, writing a VOL1 hdr with the (XF
option, issuing a MODESET then doing a TAPE DUMP (XF w/o a label,  but
in each case  the utils report that my density is 38k, not XF.

The carts I'm using are Imation Royal Guard  210MB. Are these not
capable of the higher density? I thought this was a function of the
drives, not the media.

What am I missing here?





The information contained in this e-mail and any accompanying documents may contain information that is confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, or if this message has been addressed to you in error, please immediately alert the sender by reply e-mail and then delete this message, including any attachments. Any dissemination, distribution or other use of the contents of this message by anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited.

Jim Bohnsack
Cornell Univ.
(607) 255-1760

Reply via email to