Don't let the manual get in your way, data is available from any node in a
collection. Only been messing with macros since March and maybe, control
once I start to mess with screens... web way later...
CPC- 91.21% VM3 IN:03:40-03:41 Next sample in about
41s
<-------CPU Statistics------> <----In Queue User statistics----> <-Page->
%cpu %usr %prb %sys %ovr %idl InQ Q0 Q1 Q2 Q3 Eli Ldng <-rate->
321. 308. 211. 13.4 97.1 67.6 27.3 13.0 0.13 0.08 14.0 0.00 0.00 0.2
>---Userid:-----CPU%----IO/s--DASDio-IUCV/s---PG/s-WSS(m)-Share/CP---<
1) LTCUST 100.0 5620. 5549. 4.7 0 585.8 15.0A 3
2) LTCUSTB 85.2 4495. 4458. 0.0 0 477.3 15.0A 3
3) VPLTDEV1 21.3 1200. 1199. 0.0 0 482.3 100%
VM7 IN:03:40-03:41 Next sample in about
41s
<-------CPU Statistics------> <----In Queue User statistics----> <-Page->
%cpu %usr %prb %sys %ovr %idl InQ Q0 Q1 Q2 Q3 Eli Ldng <-rate->
109. 101. 68.9 8.40 32.0 343. 25.7 2.27 0.08 0.07 23.3 0.00 0.00 0.0
>---Userid:-----CPU%----IO/s--DASDio-IUCV/s---PG/s-WSS(m)-Share/CP---<
1) VPTSEL 23.2 810.9 810.7 0.0 0 268.4 5000% 2
2) VPFS1D 15.6 433.4 432.4 0.0 0 403.8 1% 3
3) LTMESW 11.0 357.6 357.4 0.0 0 280.5 1% 3
CPC- 18.79% DL2 IN:03:40-03:41 Next sample in about
41s
<-------CPU Statistics------> <----In Queue User statistics----> <-Page->
%cpu %usr %prb %sys %ovr %idl InQ Q0 Q1 Q2 Q3 Eli Ldng <-rate->
70.2 62.5 38.5 7.69 23.9 623. 93.6 3.92 0.37 0.52 88.8 0.00 0.00 0.1
>---Userid:-----CPU%----IO/s--DASDio-IUCV/s---PG/s-WSS(m)-Share/CP---<
1) VPRTS923 3.4 88.65 88.48 0.0 0 193.5 3334% 3
2) VPRTS047 3.0 80.87 80.87 0.0 0 185.1 34% 3
3) CAPMONIT 2.3 4.03 4.03 25.3 0 2.1 50%
VM4 20060614 03:41:19 IN:03:40-03:41 Next sample in about
41s
<-------CPU Statistics------> <----In Queue User statistics----> <-Page->
%cpu %usr %prb %sys %ovr %idl InQ Q0 Q1 Q2 Q3 Eli Ldng <-rate->
55.4 51.8 46.0 3.64 5.84 636. 13.9 7.33 1.22 1.55 3.87 0.00 0.00 0.5
>---Userid:-----CPU%----IO/s--DASDio-IUCV/s---PG/s-WSS(m)-Share/CP---<
1) V710471 11.3 16.15 16.15 63.1 0 13.7 100%
2) CMSTPF41 10.1 129.0 128.5 3.2 0 19.7 250%
3) SWEEP4 2.6 26.27 26.27 6.4 0 2.1 100%
CPC- 35.73% DL1 IN:03:40-03:41 Next sample in about
41s
<-------CPU Statistics------> <----In Queue User statistics----> <-Page->
%cpu %usr %prb %sys %ovr %idl InQ Q0 Q1 Q2 Q3 Eli Ldng <-rate->
102. 95.6 78.5 6.37 17.1 193. 7.98 3.47 0.40 0.10 4.02 0.00 0.00 0.0
>---Userid:-----CPU%----IO/s--DASDio-IUCV/s---PG/s-WSS(m)-Share/CP---<
1) D665ODWK 49.8 153.2 153.2 69.3 0 12.1 6%
2) OMNIMRA1 17.5 439.3 16.93 0.0 0 4.7 6%
3) D645500 8.3 196.5 196.4 0.0 0 2.8 100%
Gregg
"No plan survives execution" revised: 01Jun06
file:\\Usfs01\Common\CPPS\VM\VMCapPlan.htm
David Boyes
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
e.net> To
Sent by: The IBM IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
z/VM Operating cc
System
<[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject
ARK.EDU> Re: OK a question about performace
monitoring
06/13/2006 09:57
Please respond to
The IBM z/VM
Operating System
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ARK.EDU>
> > It looks as if we are going to buy a kit. IBM was here and
> > suggested perf toolkit and I know there is velocity. I.ve
> > heard good things about both but what is prefered here by
> > those who have used both or either.
Both are competent tools in terms of gathering and presenting all the
performance data available in one place, but the Velocity tools do a
better job at interpreting the meaning of the numbers and presenting the
implication of the numbers. If you're not a full-time performance
weenie, this is a major benefit.
One thing that Perfkit does well is provide a nice overview of multiple
physical systems from a single control point. I haven't found a way to
do that with the Velocity tools yet, but that's probably more a lack of
RTFM on my part.
