>You really use Num Lock? I have never has a need for it, either, so I 
would be inclined to take the key cap off or >otherwise disable the key :)
>
>Regards,
>Richard Schuh

I don't usually use the Num Lock key, but it's handy when entering many 
tape volsers, etc. from a keyboard with a true numeric keypad.  However 
now that I pay more attention to the IBM X41 laptop keyboard, there's no 
numeric keypad; instead the numeric keypad is mapped to the letter keys on 
the right side of they keyboard.  It would take more time to retrain my 
fingers than just use the numbers across the top.  I'm still getting used 
to the laptop.

Sigh:  I miss my old metal 3277 keyboard, with the PFkeys on the right 
where God intended them to be, and the cursor positioning keys arranged in 
a square (matching the typical PF7/8/10/11 keys as XEDIT or ISPF's 
up/down/left/right just next door to cursor positioning keys -- never had 
to take my eyes of the screen).  Of course, using an old metal 3277 
keyboard (were it even possible) connected to a little 8.5" x 10.5" laptop 
would sort of negate the value of the small laptop size (and weigh far 
more than the laptop itself).  :-)

Thanks for all the great thoughts!

Mike Walter
Hewitt Associates
The opinions expressed herein are mine alone, not my employer's.




"Schuh, Richard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 

Sent by: "The IBM z/VM Operating System" <IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU>
06/15/2006 10:43 AM
Please respond to
"The IBM z/VM Operating System" <IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU>



To
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
cc

Subject
Re: Cursed "Scroll Lock" key vs 3270 emulators






You really use Num Lock? I have never has a need for it, either, so I 
would be inclined to take the key cap off or otherwise disable the key :)

Regards,
Richard Schuh

 -----Original Message-----
From:            The IBM z/VM Operating System 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  On Behalf Of Mike Walter
Sent:            Thursday, June 15, 2006 7:17 AM
To:              IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject:                 OT: Cursed "Scroll Lock" key vs 3270 emulators

We use IBM Personal Communications for 3270 emulation (PLEASE, I like it 
and I also have absolutely NO SAY in what we use - let's not suggest 
alternatives for this one problem). 

When the Scroll Lock (or "ScrLk") key is (always accidentally) pressed 
from an emulated 3270, odd and very frustrating things happen.  On my full 

keyboards I always just pull the Scroll Lock keycap right off they 
keyboard (along with the stupid Windows keys). 

But my IBM X41 laptop has Scroll Lock (defined as the lower-case key) and 
NumLock key (defined as the uppercase key) on the same key, so I cannot 
readily pry that keycap off without losing NumLock, too.

PCOM's keyboard remapping utility won't allow you to re-map (or turn off) 
the Scroll Lock key.  Has anyone else discovered a way to forcibly prevent 

this cursed key from working while in a 3270 emulator session?  Thanks in 
advance.

Mike Walter
Hewitt Associates
The opinions expressed herein are mine alone, not my employer's.


 
The information contained in this e-mail and any accompanying documents 
may contain information that is confidential or otherwise protected 
from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, 
or if this message has been addressed to you in error, please 
immediately alert the sender by reply e-mail and then delete this message, 

including any attachments. Any dissemination, distribution or other use of 

the contents of this message by anyone other than the intended recipient 
is strictly prohibited.




 
The information contained in this e-mail and any accompanying documents 
may contain information that is confidential or otherwise protected 
from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, 
or if this message has been addressed to you in error, please 
immediately alert the sender by reply e-mail and then delete this message, 
including any attachments. Any dissemination, distribution or other use of 
the contents of this message by anyone other than the intended recipient 
is strictly prohibited.

Reply via email to