Richard, 
I saw Bob Bolch's not about the undocumented command.  We've never
needed to use it, because VM:Secure has a list of userids and ACI groups
in VMXRPI CONFIG that have special powers when VM:Secure is down.  That,
and the fact that passwords are stored in the directory, have given us
all the capability that we've needed when VM:Secure is down.

                                                       Dennis O'Brien

I miss the old Star [Jones], who said "talk to the hand", and the hand
was covered with powdered sugar.  -- Bill Maher


-----Original Message-----
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Schuh, Richard
Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2007 09:19
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: [IBMVM] Building NonRACF CP Module

I heartily concur. It would be nice if VM:Secure had the same
capability.


Regards, 
Richard Schuh 

-----Original Message-----
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Bill Munson
Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2007 7:41 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Building NonRACF CP Module

COOL - what a great feature!

munson


Alan Altmark wrote:
> On Thursday, 03/22/2007 at 08:54 EST, Sebastian Welton
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
> wrote:
>> I've had to do this where RACF was shared with MVS systems. If the
MVS
>> systems went down then VM was pretty much stuffed so we then just
needed 
> to
>> IPL with the alternate CPLOAD module. Naturally no RACF was available

> but
>> the way VM is built its pretty much secure for the average user. In
fact
>> googling showed a posting from me about this:
>>
>>
http://listserv.uark.edu/scripts/wa.exe?A2=ind9711&L=ibmvm&T=0&P=34282
> 
> If anyone cares, you can CP SEND RACFVM SETRACF INACTIVE.  This will
cause 
> the CP-resident RACF code to begin to defer all requests back to CP,
as 
> though RACF is not present, including LOGON.  You don't have to
deactivate 
> any classes or change any permissions.  No auditing is performed.
> 
> RACF will, however, prompt the OPERATOR for confirmation.  A SETRACF 
> ACTIVE will start the wheels turning again and the OPERATOR will be 
> informed (but not prompted).
> 
> Alan Altmark
> z/VM Development
> IBM Endicott
> 

Reply via email to