David Boyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > After all, 1+1=3 for sufficiently large values of 1.
Hmm, the way we learned it was "2+2=5 for sufficiently large values of 2"...I guess we were studying higher math!! ...phsiii
David Boyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > After all, 1+1=3 for sufficiently large values of 1.
Hmm, the way we learned it was "2+2=5 for sufficiently large values of 2"...I guess we were studying higher math!! ...phsiii