When I've had a need to move 3390 volume images to another data center,
I've used CMSDDR to dump them to files, then transferred the files via
either RSCS or ISFC.  CMSDDR does some sort of packing on the files it
creates.  Empty 3390-3's result in far smaller output files than full
ones do.

                                                       Dennis

"I don't have a girlfriend.  I just know a girl who would get really mad
if she heard me say that".  -- Mitch Hedberg

  

 

________________________________

From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Huegel, Thomas
Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2007 06:40
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: [IBMVM] FW: PIPEDDR & TERSE and other stuff



Well maybe if I could get PIPEDDR to work to the remote IP (my network
guys and I disagree a bit here, my problem not yours) then maybe I'd
shutup about TERSE. I have a need to do exacatly what you mentioned
'transfer complete 3390s from one data centre to another'. A rare but
PITA occurance. I was under the, maybe false, impresion that TERSE would
do a better job of compression than PACK. It might simply be a 'the
grass is greener' syndrom.

I'll probably be happy once I can get it working... 
My thanks to the author for writing it and placing it on the download
page... 
You wouldn't be willing to share your READER/URO mods would you? please
please.. 
    

-----Original Message----- 
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Behalf Of Graeme Moss 
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2007 4:57 PM 
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU 
Subject: PIPEDDR & TERSE and other stuff 


Greetings Listers, 

PIPEDDR can use TERSE or PACK stages for compression or use 
no compression.. It only fails if TERSE option is specified 
and the stage is not available. It is written so it does not 
rely on TERSE 

I have used PIPEDDR with PACK option to transfer complete 
3390s from one data centre to another and it works well. It 
saved the delay of waiting for a courier to take a 
cartridge. 

Just an aside, I thought I would update the code so it used 
standard PIPES but when I did that TCPIP packets were lost. 
Maybe TCPCLIENT and TCPLISTEN have different code or maybe I 
screwed it up or maybe it was timing. 

Another aside. Thanks to the author Bruce Hayden publishing 
the code I was able to use PIPEDDR as a model and instead of 
using TRACKREAD and TRACKWRITE to read and write dasd I used 
READER and URO to read and write spool making a very simple 
NJETCP link. 

Cheers Graeme 


__________________________________________________________________ 
<< ella for Spam Control >> has removed VSE-List messages and set aside
VM-List for me 
You can use it too - and it's FREE!  http://www.ellaforspam.com 

__________________________________________________________________ 
<< ella for Spam Control >> has removed VSE-List messages and set aside
VM-List for me 
You can use it too - and it's FREE!  http://www.ellaforspam.com 

Reply via email to