> The server system, as it happens, reported that FTPSERVE had been forced by SYSTEM after 2G were transferred. Ah, well... that's new information. The error I saw was a 'disk full' condition (even though the filespace had 3 3390-9 DASD) after 2G sent to VM.
Obviously, this is a different situation. <In my best Gilda Radner voice: never mind> Any other messages on the FTPSERVE console? (Yeah, I know you already checked, but it obviously never hurts to ask for other evidence) Mike Walter Hewitt Associates Any opinions expressed herein are mine alone and do not necessarily represent the opinions or policies of Hewitt Associates. "Adam Thornton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "The IBM z/VM Operating System" <IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU> 08/28/2007 10:57 PM Please respond to "The IBM z/VM Operating System" <IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU> To IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU cc Subject Re: Augh On Aug 28, 2007, at 6:09 PM, Mike Walter wrote: Well, there **used** to be an undocumented 2G limit to FTP transfers into VM. The error messages indicated that the disk was full. But that was supposed to have been fixed a long time ago. Are you 100% positive that you are using the current CMS FTP client and server code (can't remember the guilty party) - nothing "leftover" lying around? I'm pretty sure it was current. The server system, as it happens, reported that FTPSERVE had been forced by SYSTEM after 2G were transferred. It's a 5.2 system with pretty close to the current maintenance on it. Adam The information contained in this e-mail and any accompanying documents may contain information that is confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, or if this message has been addressed to you in error, please immediately alert the sender by reply e-mail and then delete this message, including any attachments. Any dissemination, distribution or other use of the contents of this message by anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited.
