On Monday, 04/28/2008 at 05:38 EDT, "Schuh, Richard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I see. It was presented to me, second hand, as a replacement for > VM/VTAM, not an addition to it. That may well have been a > misunderstanding of what was presented.
Oh, my. I can see where such a statement might, perhaps, engender a wee bit of confusion in the listener. ;-) Alan Altmark z/VM Development IBM Endicott
