Re: PRIROUTER question

[[EMAIL PROTECTED]]

I think, we shouldn't waste time in discussing Shimon's font settings. I 
have put his picture through the clipboard into my editor and the 
"picture" was in fixed font. This was an effort of about 5 seconds.

kind regards
Franz Josef Pohlen

Schuh, Richard schrieb:
If you have such a reader, then maybe the whole note needs to be in a
fixed font. Not pretty for those who have Bronze Age readers instead of
ones from the Stone Age, but workable. It is a choice between beauty
(for most) and utility (for all). :-)

Regards, 
Richard Schuh 

 

  
-----Original Message-----
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kris Buelens
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 12:51 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: PRIROUTER question

But Richard, we are asked not to use markup in mail addressed 
to the list as some people don't use HTML capable readers.  
Pleasing both groups seems impossible.

2008/6/26 Schuh, Richard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
    
I do not have the answer, but I do have a suggestion. When 
      
you make drawings like below, use a fixed font such as 
Courier or Courier New. It makes them look so much better - 
and clearer.
    
+-LPAR A--+-LPAR B---+
| +---+   | +---+    |
| | X |   | + Y +    |
| +---+   | +---+    |
|    |    |    |     |
|    +----|----+     |
|    | VM | VM |     |
+---------+----------+
       | OSA |
       +-----+

Regards,
Richard Schuh





________________________________
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System 
      
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    
On Behalf Of Shimon Lebowitz
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 3:19 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: PRIROUTER question

Hi,
I am not sure about something and would like confirmation.
Assuming this setup:
+-LPAR A--+-LPAR B---+
| +---+   | +---+    |
| | X |   | + Y +    |
| +---+   | +---+    |
|    |    |    |     |
|    +----|----+     |
|    | VM | VM |     |
+---------+----------+
       | OSA |
       +-----+
VM TCPIP in LPAR A: 10.0.0.7
VM TCPIP in LPAR B: 10.0.0.12
Virtual machine X in LPAR A: 10.1.4.2
Virtual machine Y in LPAR B: 10.1.3.2
Our network routes requests for 10.1.4.2 to 10.0.0.7, which is 
connected to X via a virtual CTC.
Machine X has 10.0.0.7 as its default gateway, so all of 
      
its traffic, 
    
in and out, is via 10.0.0.7.
Now I was asked to do the same thing with a virtual machine 
      
in LPAR B:
    
1) to set the default gateway in machine Y to 10.0.0.12
2) to connect VM TCPIP to machine Y with a VCTC
3) to have the network route traffic for 10.1.3.2 to 10.0.0.12
   so that VM's TCPIP at 10.0.0.12 will send it on to 10.1.3.2.
My problem is that I *think* I understand that the OSA will 
      
not agree 
    
to do this, since the VM host on LPAR A has the OSA defined as 
PRIROUTER and on LPAR B it is defined as NONROUTER.
So, my questions here are:
1) Can the task requested be done, or will NONROUTER prevent
    VM in LPAR B from getting the packets for 10.1.3.2?
2) If #1 is in fact a problem, how can it be solved WITHOUT going
    to VSWITCH?  Is there such a solution?
Thanks,
Shimon

--

      
**************************************************************
**********
    
Shimon Lebowitz                mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
VM System Programmer           .
Israel Police National HQ.
Jerusalem, Israel              phone: +972 2 542-9877  fax: 542-9308

      
**********************************************************************
    
**
      

--
Kris Buelens,
IBM Belgium, VM customer support