I think you need to make the LNXSFS FilePool a *global* resource ...
JR (Steven) Imler CA Senior Sustaining Engineer Tel: +1 703 708 3479 [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -----Original Message----- > From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Marcy Cortes > Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2008 01:02 PM > To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU > Subject: Re: IPGATE question > > Hmm. Well, I see it is picking up the correct TCPIPUSERID by peering > into IPGATE1 MTREXX. It seems to accept the connection: > > flag" > > IPGATEI0000000006 started. (3 2 AF_INET 3276 10.93.27.253) > > IPGATEI0000000006 User MARCY from 10.93.27.253 has been accepted for > LNXSFS > IPGATEI0000000006 ended. > > > > And yet on the remote system I get: > acc lnxsfs:sles9. c > DMSACR1151E File pool LNXSFS is unavailable > Ready(00055); T=0.01/0.01 10:00:32 > > > > Q resource on the remote system indicates it is there too: > Resource: LNXSFS Type: Local Owning Userid: IPGATE > > I can't see anything I might have misconfigured - it is simple really - > and I do have it running to another system. > > Anyone have a clue what I could check next? > > Marcy > > "This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If > you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the > addressee, you must not use, copy, disclose, or take any action based on > this message or any information herein. If you have received this > message in error, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail > and delete this message. Thank you for your cooperation." > > > -----Original Message----- > From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Thomas Kern > Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2008 8:51 AM > To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU > Subject: Re: [IBMVM] IPGATE question > > I have a second stack to use the HyperSockets between a CP and an IFL > systems. The IPGATE servers have a TCPIP DATA on their A-disk which > defin= es the TCPIPUSERID. > > /Tom Kern > /301-903-2211 > > > > On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 10:39:53 -0500, Marcy Cortes > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >Is anyone using IPGATE with a TCPIP stack who has a name other than > >TCPIP? I have one system working and another which doesn't and that's > >the only difference I can find. > > > > > >Marcy
