On Wednesday, 10/29/2008 at 04:11 EDT, "Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks all. I was able to get RACF back running. I did not have RACFSMF > set up to handle the switching. I am doing that now!! > > One last note after I cleared the SMF data sets and re-ipled RACFVM (I > IPL 490 CL) it still asked for the USERID that was set up to handle the > switching (RACFSMF) and the disk that was used to link 'TO'. I had to > supply this information before RACFVM would come back up even though I > did not have RACFSMF setup(?)
Or go into SMF CONTROL and change the "1" to a "0". (Not documented. Shhh. You didn't hear it from me.) I already opened up an internal problem report on this particular point. Bizzare - two people with the same problem on the same day! (The other was an internal IBM account.) Alan Altmark z/VM Development IBM Endicott
