On Sunday, 07/12/2009 at 01:18 EDT, Marcy Cortes <marcy.d.cor...@wellsfargo.com> wrote: > Was there a change in there that if you hadn't specificied a native VLAN number > that it became 001 instead of whatever VLAN parm was set to?
Yes. I think it was changed as part of the port isolation support. It works now like it should have worked from the beginning. Alan Altmark z/VM Development IBM Endicott
