I understand, Ray. I just tried to prevent those who read this list and who may be new to REXX from thinking that Signal is widely accepted in constructing loops.
Ivica On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 5:30 AM, Mrohs, Ray <ray.mr...@usdoj.gov> wrote: > My posting was the result of frustration with SFS. I wasn't thinking > about perfect code structure. Frankly, at a certain age you care less about > those things, as long as it works and the boss is happy. :-) But I > understand your criticism. > > Ray > > ------------------------------ > *From:* The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] *On > Behalf Of *Ivica Brodaric > *Sent:* Wednesday, February 24, 2010 10:46 AM > > *To:* IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU > *Subject:* Re: An SFS aid > > May I suggest that you also see "call", "return", "do forever" and "leave" > in REXX manual? You can easily implement those in your program. Please don't > use "signal" unless you are handling an error and/or about to leave the > program. I hope I've put this nicely... > > Ivica > >
