I've never used it. I never saw the point. The S and Y disk directories are saved in the CMS NSS and while we have an in-house disk that is accessed by nearly everybody, the restriction that the segment for SAVEFD must be below the 16M line makes it pretty much unusable for us. Who wants to manage any more segments below the line when almost everything
else is above the line? (Another requirement for DB? :-)> ) -- Dale R. Smith On Thu, 6 May 2010 09:54:38 -0400, Gentry, Stephen <stephen.gen...@lafayettelife.com> wrote: >With the speed of z9's and z10's and the speed of DASD subsystems, is >there much of a need to use SAVEFD anymore? > >I guess if a minidisk had extremely high utilization then it might. > >Thoughts? > >Thanks, > >Steve > >
