Thank you, Marcy! I appreciate the quick response. Regards, Dave
On Mon, 2010-05-17 at 18:32 -0500, Marcy Cortes wrote: > Will work, but would be nicer to it if you did a "set vswitch xxxx > disconnect" first. > You will lose all connectivity with no backup, but you know that ;) > > > > Marcy > > "This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you > are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the addressee, you > must not use, copy, disclose, or take any action based on this message or any > information herein. If you have received this message in error, please advise > the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this message. Thank you for > your cooperation." > > > -----Original Message----- > From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On > Behalf Of Dave Keeton > Sent: Monday, May 17, 2010 3:54 PM > To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU > Subject: [IBMVM] VSWITCH Question > > We're updating some OSA micro code and I'm trying to determine the most > effective way to take the VSWITCH connected to a production OSA offline > so the code can update properly. I know that the OSA device has to be > vary'd offline, as does the path and CHPID. Is there a way to tell a > VSWITCH to shutdown without destroying it? This particular VSWITCH > doesn't have a second fail-over address. If I detach the device from the > VSWITCH controller, vary the device, path and CHPID offline, will this > suffice? > > Thanks in advance, > Dave Keeton
