The statements are the same, but does that mean that group "system" is in fact defined? Check for that group in your POSIXGROUP statements. The DMSOVO2129E message says it's looking for a GID, the number behind the name.
Forgive me if you already know this. A lot of VMers are still new to POSIX things like UID numbers and GID numbers and the very idea of putting them into the CP Directory. I think it was a brilliant stroke and very well implemented, though it took me some time to become fully indoctrinated with what the Endicott team had done. -- R; <>< On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 11:08, Jim Bohnsack <jab...@cornell.edu> wrote: > I'm trying to run PUT2PROD on the latest maintenance, RSU 1002 for z/VM 5.4, > and have hit a BFS roadblock. While PUT2PROD is working on TCPIP, I'm > seeing a BFS error for LDAPSRV. The LDAPSRV id, the POSIXGROUP statements, > and the LDAPSRV POSIXINFO are the same as when they were delivered from IBM > with 5.4. I'm getting the following error in the PUT2PROD $CONS: > > DTCPRD3021I TCP2PROD processing > started > DTCPRD3018I No options in > effect > DTCPRD3040I Issuing > command: > VMFSIM QUERY SERVP2P PPF TDATA :COMPNAME TCPIPP2P :PRODID (STEM > !VMF > > DTCPRD3006I Product ID in effect: > 5VMTCP40%TCPIP > DTCPRD3012I Obtaining PPF :DCL. > information... > DTCPRD3019I Processing file(s) for: > <BFS> > LDAPSRV LOADBFS I -->> > <BFS> > RC=0 from EXEC OPENVM UNMOUNT > / > DMSOVO2129E GID not found for > system > ERROR: RC=32 from EXEC OPENVM OWNER /../VMBFS:VMSYS:LDAPSRV/ system > LDAPSRV > DTCPRD3038E LOADBFS command completed with RC = 1 > > Any suggestions as to what I can do with this would be appreciated. BFS is > an absolute mystery to me. > > Jim > > -- > James Bohnsack > (972) 596-6377 home/office > (972) 342-5823 cell
