Um, uh... then why not simply remove the PORT argument from the z/VM 
manuals and from the command syntax itself - issuing an error message 
(unsupported operand) when it is specified?
I'll submit an RCF if it will help with that part.  :-)

That would not help the issue with Linux guests, but there would be one 
less bullet in the chamber, no?

Respectfully,
Mike Walter
Hewitt Associates
The opinions expressed herein are mine alone, not my employer's.



"Alan Altmark" <alan_altm...@us.ibm.com> 

Sent by: "The IBM z/VM Operating System" <IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU>
08/27/2010 01:38 PM
Please respond to
"The IBM z/VM Operating System" <IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU>



To
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
cc

Subject
Re: Defining VSWITCH difficulties






On Friday, 08/27/2010 at 12:26 EDT, George Henke/NYLIC 
<george_he...@newyorklife.com> wrote:
> 09:26:39 DTCOSD310E VSWITCH-OSD device VSWAILT181DDEV: Missing or 
incorrect 
> required port name 
> 09:26:39 DTCOSD082E VSWITCH-OSD shutting down: 
> 
> The VSWITCH expects, requires a port name for 181D. 
> 
> Either the Portname or the Port number which defaulted to P0 is wrong. 
> 
> You can specify port number as 181d.Px
> 
> You may want to try a QUERY VSWITCH RDEV 181D for more information. 

I've been harping on this since port names became optional in October 2003 

(7 years ago!):  DO NOT SPECIFY A PORT *NAME* in Linux or z/VM IP or 
VSWITCH configurations!

Yes, they are required in z/OS, but that's a z/OS Comm Server issue.

Alan Altmark
z/VM Development
IBM Endicott





The information contained in this e-mail and any accompanying documents may 
contain information that is confidential or otherwise protected from 
disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, or if this 
message has been addressed to you in error, please immediately alert the sender 
by reply e-mail and then delete this message, including any attachments. Any 
dissemination, distribution or other use of the contents of this message by 
anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited. All messages 
sent to and from this e-mail address may be monitored as permitted by 
applicable law and regulations to ensure compliance with our internal policies 
and to protect our business. E-mails are not secure and cannot be guaranteed to 
be error free as they can be intercepted, amended, lost or destroyed, or 
contain viruses. You are deemed to have accepted these risks if you communicate 
with us by e-mail. 


Reply via email to