CP will page out to the disk with the best performance, so yes, the mdl3's
may be filled too much when mixing sizes.

2010/9/30 O'Brien, Dennis L
<dennis.l.o'br...@bankofamerica.com<dennis.l.o%27br...@bankofamerica.com>
>

> On of our z/VM 5.4.0 systems is about to grow to 140 GB of storage.  Given
> our target overcommit ratio of 3:1, and IBM's advice to keep paging space no
> more than 50% full, this should just about fit onto 240 or 248 3390-3 sized
> volumes.  My question is what will happen the next time we add storage.
>  Clearly, we'll have to start using 3390-9 sized volumes for paging.  Would
> we be better off converting only enough volumes to satisfy the space
> requirement, which would maximize the number of devices, or should we
> convert all volumes to 3390-9 to keep them the same size?  My concern is
> that if we mix sizes, CP will try to allocate the same amount of space on
> each volume, and the 3390-3's will get more than half full.  On the other
> hand, maximizing the number of devices maximizes the number of concurrent
> I/O's.  Our Storage people aren't going to give me 240 3390-9's if I don't
> need them, so if I add another 32 GB of storage, my choice would be
> something like 212 3390-3's and 28 3390-9's, or 100 3390-9's.  Which would
> be a better choice?
>
>                                                Dennis
>
> "Decision" is not a verb.
>



-- 
Kris Buelens,
IBM Belgium, VM customer support

Reply via email to