On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 1:35 PM, Martin Zimelis <martin.zime...@gmail.com> wrote:
> And record one more vote that mixed sizes is a very bad idea (for > the reasons Rob described). But "your very bad may vary" ;-) For anyone still awake, ponder on this one... "Rob, we just put in 30 volumes 3390-9 for paging. After the IPL, we noticed that we failed to remove 540PAG (a 3390-3) from the CP owned list. Can't get it off because it is in use. Somebody said that mixing volume sizes is a very bad idea. Is it good enough to just drain that volume or should we plan for another IPL to take it off?" | Rob
