MVS doesn't normally have anything to forward performance info to Perfkit. MVS has its own performance collection and reporting tools.
2011/8/6 saurabh khandelwal <sourabhkhandelwal...@gmail.com> > Thanks for reply. > > > Yes, I am trying to reach out the person, who has configured Performance > toolkit in my site. So that I can get exact detail, how he configured this. > > As I am new with performance toolkit, I also wanted to ask is it possible > to get MVS guest information from performance toolkit , which are running > under z/VM. > > Thanks & Regards > Saurabh > > > On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 1:44 PM, Jeff Gribbin <jeff.grib...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> Saurabh, >> You have almost-certainly indentified the cause of your problem - it is >> NEVER, EVER safe to share the same CMS minidisk accessed in write-mode by >> more than one CMS user at the same time - it almost-guarantees that the disk >> file system will be damaged. >> >> DASD sharing always requires the sharing systems to be aware that the DASD >> is shared and take measures to ensure that the data is not corrupted - these >> can be via hardware functions such as RESERVE / RELEASE or via software >> processes that use a communications link to agree amongst themselves which >> system has write-permission at any one instant. >> >> CMS contains no sharing mechanism at all for its minidisks (think of a CMS >> user as a virtual Personal Computer - write-sharing a minidisk is like >> connecting two personal computers that have no knowledge of each others' >> existence to the same hard drive!) >> >> If you wish to share data in write-mode among CMS users then you need to >> look at the CMS Shared File System which uses a server to co-ordinate the >> I/O among many CMS clients. (In this client/server setup, it's only the DATA >> that is shared - the actual DASD is only read/written by the server which >> (of course) has complete knowledge of which clients are accessing which >> data.) >> >> Sharing minidisk-containing volumes between separate z/VM systems requires >> a lot of care if it is to be successful. If you can tell us a little more >> about your configuration and how you run it I'm sure that we can offer you >> some suggestions about how to achieve what you wish to do but ... in the >> meantime ... yes, each PERFSVM requires a separate 191 (and 195) minidisk. >> >> Regards >> Jeff Gribbin >> > > > > -- > Thanks & Regards > Saurabh Khandelwal > -- Kris Buelens, IBM Belgium, VM customer support