MVS doesn't normally have anything to forward performance info to Perfkit.
MVS has its own performance collection and reporting tools.

2011/8/6 saurabh khandelwal <sourabhkhandelwal...@gmail.com>

> Thanks for reply.
>
>
> Yes, I am trying to reach out the person, who has configured Performance
> toolkit in my site. So that I can get exact detail, how he configured this.
>
> As I am new with performance toolkit, I also wanted to ask is it possible
> to get MVS guest information from performance toolkit , which are running
> under z/VM.
>
> Thanks & Regards
> Saurabh
>
>
> On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 1:44 PM, Jeff Gribbin <jeff.grib...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Saurabh,
>> You have almost-certainly indentified the cause of your problem - it is
>> NEVER, EVER safe to share the same CMS minidisk accessed in write-mode by
>> more than one CMS user at the same time - it almost-guarantees that the disk
>> file system will be damaged.
>>
>> DASD sharing always requires the sharing systems to be aware that the DASD
>> is shared and take measures to ensure that the data is not corrupted - these
>> can be via hardware functions such as RESERVE / RELEASE or via software
>> processes that use a communications link to agree amongst themselves which
>> system has write-permission at any one instant.
>>
>> CMS contains no sharing mechanism at all for its minidisks (think of a CMS
>> user as a virtual Personal Computer - write-sharing a minidisk is like
>> connecting two personal computers that have no knowledge of each others'
>> existence to the same hard drive!)
>>
>> If you wish to share data in write-mode among CMS users then you need to
>> look at the CMS Shared File System which uses a server to co-ordinate the
>> I/O among many CMS clients. (In this client/server setup, it's only the DATA
>> that is shared - the actual DASD is only read/written by the server which
>> (of course) has complete knowledge of which clients are accessing which
>> data.)
>>
>> Sharing minidisk-containing volumes between separate z/VM systems requires
>> a lot of care if it is to be successful.  If you can tell us a little more
>> about your configuration and how you run it I'm sure that we can offer you
>> some suggestions about how to achieve what you wish to do but ... in the
>> meantime ... yes, each PERFSVM requires a separate 191 (and 195) minidisk.
>>
>> Regards
>> Jeff Gribbin
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Thanks & Regards
> Saurabh Khandelwal
>



-- 
Kris Buelens,
IBM Belgium, VM customer support

Reply via email to