On 3/22/13 9:45 AM, Katie Cunningham wrote:
Neat project!
Do we have an actual UX or design person in the group? Because if we
don't, getting one may help us frame some of these questions.
I don't think so. This community mainly attracts developers, not UX
specialists or designers.
I'm curious about the purpose of "re-envisioning" IDLE. It has always
been adequate for my needs--a simple IDE. The Python shell is useful for
working out snippets of code, and the text editor is workable enough for
me. While bugs do crop up from time to time, they are usually
fixed--fixed faster if one is able to contribute a patch, as I do when
I'm able.
But I don't consider IDLE in any way "broken": what leads you to such a
conclusion?
--Kevin
--
Kevin Walzer
Code by Kevin/Mobile Code by Kevin
http://www.codebykevin.com
http://www.wtmobilesoftware.com
_______________________________________________
IDLE-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/idle-dev
