> >In an RFC822 parser, a mailbox can't be KC-canonicalized immediately > >because "_" is a compatibility character which expands to an > >underlined space (entirely logical, IMO). > > This statement is false. U+005F has no compatibility decomposition. and what you can put in an RFC822 address has nothing to do with this group. Keith
- Re: [idn] Unicode tagging Keith Moore
- Re: [idn] Unicode tagging Dan Oscarsson
- Re: [idn] Unicode tagging James Seng
- Re: [idn] Unicode tagging Keith Moore
- Re: [idn] Unicode tagging Mark Davis
- Re: [idn] Unicode tagging Dan Oscarsson
- Re: [idn] Unicode tagging Keith Moore
- Re: [idn] Unicode tagging Paul Hoffman / IMC
- Re: [idn] Unicode tagging Frank Ernens
- Re: [idn] Unicode tagging Paul Hoffman / IMC
- Re: [idn] Unicode tagging Keith Moore
- Re: [idn] Unicode tagging James Seng
- Re: [idn] Unicode tagging Frank Ernens
- Re: [idn] Unicode tagging Keith Moore
- Re: [idn] Unicode tagging Dan Oscarsson
- Re: [idn] Unicode tagging Keith Moore
- RE: [idn] Unicode tagging Andrew Draper
- Re: [idn] Unicode tagging Keith Moore
- RE: [idn] Unicode tagging Andrew Draper
- Re: [idn] Unicode tagging Keith Moore
