actually I think it's important to establish that no matter what IDN does, this does not inherently affect *any* application - and explicitly does not affect the data formats exchanged by applications. each application must determine how to accomodate IDNs. Keith p.s. as one specific case, RFC822 is actually quite difficult to change. It is not as simple as using RFC 2047 encodings in email addresses. It's not even clear that RFC 2047 is suitable for this purpose. (speaking as author of RFC 2047)
- Re: [idn] Unicode tagging Keith Moore
- Re: [idn] Unicode tagging Mark Davis
- Re: [idn] Unicode tagging Dan Oscarsson
- Re: [idn] Unicode tagging Keith Moore
- Re: [idn] Unicode tagging Paul Hoffman / IMC
- Re: [idn] Unicode tagging Frank Ernens
- Re: [idn] Unicode tagging Paul Hoffman / IMC
- Re: [idn] Unicode tagging Keith Moore
- Re: [idn] Unicode tagging James Seng
- Re: [idn] Unicode tagging Frank Ernens
- Re: [idn] Unicode tagging Keith Moore
- Re: [idn] Unicode tagging Dan Oscarsson
- Re: [idn] Unicode tagging Keith Moore
- RE: [idn] Unicode tagging Andrew Draper
- Re: [idn] Unicode tagging Keith Moore
- RE: [idn] Unicode tagging Andrew Draper
- Re: [idn] Unicode tagging Keith Moore
- Re: [idn] Unicode tagging RJ Atkinson
- Re: [idn] Unicode tagging Keith Moore
- Re: [idn] Unicode tagging RJ Atkinson
