> > Next questions then: > > 1. Who have confirmed it in Japan and Korea as stated in your draft. > > > > 2. You have two source. How you put it as one table? You did not use the > > table as-it-is in its original form right? > Not correct !
Okay, in others words, the two source you reference are exactly identitical? > > 3. If you indeed combine the two sources into a single table, I presumed > > there would be many overlaps in the tables but still some conflicts. > > What about those conflicting cases and how have you deal with them? SInce the table is identitical, then this question is irrelevant. And I am waiting for the last 2 questions, thanks. > > 3. Why did the authorities creates such tables in the first place? What > > is their written policy on the stablility of the tables and futures > > changes? What is the procedure for someone to add/delete/modifyt (if > > possible) such tables if someone thinks there is a need to update it? > > > > 4. Have it been go thru codepoint experts review by UTC or IRG etc? > > > > Standard questions which someone would ask...:-) very simply to the one > > asked about reordering.
