> > Okay, in others words, the two source you reference are exactly > > identitical? > > > Not correct ! > The PRC-SC is one of the variants in the dictionary. But the > PRC-SC is not arbitary created , they still based on some rule. The > dictionary verified all sources of variants . They are not identical.
Okay, I hearing different answer...but anyway, if that is the case, there are two souce as you said and they are not identical. How do you put the two source into a single table? What is the policy? For example, I notice U+56FD & U+570B (the "guo" which Ted mention) just suddenly disappear in the latest draft. Who made that decision and how is it done? What policy this authority adopts? > Sorry , it is a goverment's documents of PRC , so we can not > answer the "why" problems. The first source is at 1956 , the referenced > documents fixed in 1964. It is re-announced in 1986. The tables are distributed to teachers actually for education purposes. -James Seng
