> With the most recent updates to the IDNA, punycode, nameprep, and stringprep > documents do the document editors believe that the issues raised by Erik's > questions have all been resolved? I'm wondering if the current document set > is thought to be ready for IESG review (and if Erik concurs), or if more > edits are planned.
The stringprep document has been discussed by the IESG resulting in a request to make the document more explicit about various Unicode related security issues. The second set of last-called documents (IDNA, punycode, and nameprep) still have some IETF last call issues to resolve. The resultion will be in the form of an added applicability section in the IDNA document. There is still some word-smithing on that section, after which the documents will be ready to be discussed by the IESG as a whole. Erik
